How Many Calories Does Rock Climbing Burn

Rock climbing is much more than just a physical activity; it’s an intense, full-body workout that engages muscles throughout your entire body. From the powerful bursts required for bouldering to the sustained effort of a multi-pitch route, climbing provides a highly comprehensive physical demand.

If you’ve ever wondered exactly how many calories you torch during a session, you’re not alone. However, providing a single, precise number is difficult because climbing involves dynamic aerobic and anaerobic activities, often with intermittent stopping and starting.

Based on established physiological data, we can estimate the energy demands across the climbing spectrum.

Related Articles •
What Muscles Does Rock Climbing Work?
How to Increase Grip Strength for Rock Climbing
What to Wear Rock Climbing

The Science of Energy Expenditure: Understanding METs

To move beyond simple averages and accurately quantify energy demands, experts rely on the Metabolic Equivalent (MET) framework. METs are the scientifically accepted standard for objectively comparing and estimating the energy cost of various physical activities.

Here’s a quick breakdown of what METs mean:

• Definition: One MET is the amount of energy (calories) your body expends while resting quietly.
• Equivalency: One MET of energy expenditure is defined as 1 kilocalorie per kilogram of body weight per hour (1 kcal/kg/hour).
• Intensity Levels: Activities with a MET value of 3.0 to 6.0 are considered moderate, while those with a value greater than 6.0 METs are classified as vigorous. General rock climbing typically falls into the vigorous category.

The Fundamental Calculation Formula

To estimate the calories burned (kcal/hour) during a defined activity period, you can use the following formula:

$$\text{Calories Burned (kcal/hour)} = \text{Body Weight (kg)} \times \text{MET Value} \times \text{Duration (hours)}$$

Calculating the Active Burn Rate

The scientifically established benchmark for general active rock climbing, ascending or traversing rock, is commonly assigned an 8.0 MET value.

This high metabolic rate means that when actively climbing, the average person may expend about 8 to 11 kilocalories per minute. This translates to a general range of 400 to 660 Calories burned per hour when you are continuously moving on the wall.

The table below provides estimated caloric expenditure for one hour of continuous, active climbing at the $8.0 \text{ METs}$ benchmark:

Note: For rigorous nutritional planning, keep in mind that the MET calculation provides the total energy used during the activity. To find the net, exercise-specific calorie burn, subtract 1 MET (your resting metabolic rate) from the total MET value. This means the climbing activity itself accounts for 7 METs of net work.

The Climbing Spectrum: Intensity Matters

The energy cost in climbing is heavily dependent on the specific discipline, intensity, and continuity of the movement. The 8.0 METs figure is an average. Highly technical or fast climbing demands significantly more, while less strenuous activities require less.

Beyond the Wall: Multi-Day Climbs

For complex undertakings like backcountry adventures or multi-day big wall ascents, accurate calorie accounting involves far more than just the time spent pulling on holds. These routes demand composite energy calculations:

• High Demands: Big wall ascents involve strenuous logistical tasks, such as hauling heavy gear, water, and food.
• Approaches: The hike to the wall often involves high intensity hiking up steep hills, typically rated at 8.0 METs. Carrying a heavy pack of 20 to 30 kg usually requires an effort between 6.5 and 7.5 METs.
• Total Needs: These activities push total daily energy needs far beyond standard recommendations, often requiring over 4,000 kcal per day just to cover normal activity plus exercise.

The Intermittency Paradox: Session Burn vs. Active Burn

The biggest reason raw calorie estimates are often inaccurate is that most climbing sessions are intermittent—you aren’t actively climbing for the entire time. Especially during indoor bouldering or top-roping, the actual time spent moving (Active Climbing Time, ACT) can be less than 50% of the total time at the gym or crag.

To get a Realistic Session Rate (RSR), you must account for the time spent resting, belaying, or planning the route. When you’re standing or belaying, you’re still burning energy, but at a low to moderate rate, typically around 2.0 to 3.0 METs.

For example, if a climber is only active on the wall (8.0 METs) for 40% of their time and resting (2.5 METs) for the remaining 60%, the average session calorie burn (RSR) drops significantly compared to the maximal active rate.

Don’t Forget the Afterburn Effect (EPOC)

Despite the inevitable rest periods that reduce the overall session burn rate, intense climbing sessions deliver a powerful metabolic bonus called Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption (EPOC), often nicknamed the “afterburn” effect.

Because climbing relies heavily on maximal isometric contraction and resistance effort—inducing high blood lactate levels similar to High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)—it strongly stimulates this EPOC response.

• Mechanism: EPOC is the elevated metabolic rate that occurs post-exercise as your body consumes extra oxygen to restore physiological systems to homeostasis.
• Contribution: EPOC can contribute an additional 6% to 15% to the total caloric expenditure of the climbing session, partially compensating for the time spent resting.

Why Your Fitness Tracker Is Lying to You

While consumer-grade wrist-worn activity monitors are reasonably accurate at measuring heart rate (HR), they consistently struggle with accurately estimating Energy Expenditure (EE) during complex, non-steady-state activities like climbing.

• High Error Rate: Studies have shown that even the most accurate devices can be off by an average of 27%, and the least accurate can be off by as much as 93% when estimating EE.
• The HR-Movement Disconnect: Trackers use algorithms based on movement patterns correlated with steady-state activities like running. Climbing disrupts this relationship: when you perform a maximal isometric lock-off, your high muscular strain and blood lactate cause a rapid HR spike, which the device falsely extrapolates as continuous, high-aerobic caloric burn.
• Empirical Evidence: In high-intensity intermittent training (which shares metabolic characteristics with bouldering), studies have confirmed significant mean relative errors in caloric measurement.

For reliable metabolic tracking, it is recommended that climbers use their devices primarily for monitoring heart rate trends and logging time, but they should rely on the scientifically established MET values and the Realistic Session Rate (RSR) formula for accurate caloric calculation.

Conclusion: Fueling Your Climb

Rock climbing is a high-demand, vigorous exercise that burns serious calories during its active periods, often metabolically matching continuous running. The actual calories burned for a whole session typically range from the Realistic Session Rate (RSR) ranges from around 300 kcal per hour during intermittent climbing to over 1,000 kcal per hour during continuous, maximum effort climbing.

For climbers, accurately tracking caloric output isn’t just about weight loss; it is fundamental to optimal performance, recovery, and health. Because climbing is a strength-to-weight ratio sport, insufficient caloric intake relative to your energy output (RSR + EPOC) can lead to detrimental effects like Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S), compromising recovery and degrading performance.

Instead of getting hung up on the imperfect numbers generated by fitness trackers, focus on using the MET estimates to ensure you consume enough nutrient-dense fuel (like carbohydrates, fat, and protein) to match your Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) and crush your next project.